Passive investing worse than Marxism?

The rise of passive asset management threatens to “fundamentally undermine the entire system of capitalism”, according to analysts at US research firm Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. In a provocatively titled note, ‘The Silent Road to Serfdom: Why Passive Investing is Worse Than Marxism’, the firm says politicians and regulators need to be highly wary of the rise of passive investing, and cognisant of the “vital importance” of active management to the wider economy. "A supposedly capitalist economy where the only investment is passive is worse than either a centrally planned economy or an economy with active market led capital management," the note says. “In a Marxist society, at least someone is doing the planning of capital allocation – in a predominantly passive market the capital allocation process is done by a marginal participant.” The firm is concerned that the media and analysts are increasingly pushing investors towards low-cost tracker funds, without taking into account the potential risks of a purely, or predominantly, passive asset management market. It states that the rise of indexing means stocks are tending to move in the same direction more often. The alleged upshot of this is the correlation of stock price increases, impeding the efficient allocation of capital. Bernstein’s note advises lawmakers and regulators to consider the broader benefits of a functioning active asset management industry to society, and ensure policy initiatives do not explicitly undermine active management. Reaction to the note has been mixed. Robin Powell, who writes a blog called Evidence Investor, said fears of a purely passive market in years to come are significantly exaggerated. He noted that while there has been a significant shift towards passively managed vehicles in the US in recent years, passive funds still account for only a modest proportion of total investable assets. “Almost everywhere else in the world indexing has barely scratched the surface. It’s taken more than 40 years for passive to reach the point it has in the States, and it won’t achieve worldwide domination overnight,” he said. “It’s extraordinary that an industry that has effectively imposed a stealth tax on investors for decades is now being presented as the bastion of a vibrant economy. In allowing ordinary people to keep a bigger share of their investment returns for themselves, passive investing serves a far greater social and economic purpose than professional stockpicking ever did.” Craig Lazzara, global head of index investment strategy at S&P Dow Jones Indices, asked where passive assets were flowing from. “If you believe some active managers are more skillful than others, and their skill is manifested in outperformance, then presumably it must be the least skillful active managers who lose the most assets.  In that case, the existence of a passive alternative raises the quality of the surviving active managers, and thus contributes to market efficiency,” he said. Conversely, Wesley Gray, chief investment officer of Alpha Architect, an exchange-traded fund firm, said the note was a “timely warning”. “Lower costs and easier access to more investment options may encourage excess trading and performance-chasing. As yet, the benefits of passive vehicles are not entirely clear,” he said. ©2016 funds europe

Sponsored Profiles

SPONSORED FEATURE: Investing for income

May 17, 2017

Portfolio Manager Thomas Kruse examines the findings from Pioneer Investments’ survey on income investing and outlines ways of achieving a target income.

SPONSORED ARTICLE: A radical solution to KYC concerns

May 17, 2017

The 1MDB affair shows that lax know-your-customer and due-diligence procedures are a major risk, says Paolo Brignardello, head of product management and marketing, Fundsquare. New solutions are...

SPONSORED FEATURE: AIFMD - What does Brexit mean?

Apr 18, 2017

An open discussion between funds industry experts and initiated by SGG Luxembourg took place in London to examine  the implications of Brexit for UK fund managers marketing to the EU.

SPONSORED FEATURE: Luxembourg fund reporting – CRS vs FATCA

Apr 18, 2017

Luxembourg funds need clear procedures for CRS compliance, writes Andrew Knight, Partner at M Partners, a member of the Maitland network of law firms.

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Finding managers that can (and do)

Apr 18, 2017

Fabrice Kremer, a fund selector at Banque de Luxembourg Investments, has berated fundamental managers for failing to beat indices, but he remains committed to active funds. He speaks to Nick...

JERSEY INTERVIEW: ‘A steady sort of place’

Mar 21, 2017

The chief executive of Jersey Finance is keen to portray the island as a stable, trustworthy jurisdiction. He talks to George Mitton.



May 17, 2017

With such an intangible product, it can be hard for asset managers to communicate what they do. Having personality and connecting with customer aspirations may be the key, our branding roundtable hears.

ROUNDTABLE: The issue is perception

Mar 21, 2017

Our panel discuss tax transparency, the elegance of private placement and why Jersey could do more to promote itself. Chaired by Tom Cowsill in Saint Helier.