Is it a myth that actives add value in under researched markets?

Legal & General Investment Management’s indexation head Simon Midgen has added weight to the active-versus-passive debate. He says the received wisdom that active managers tend to outperform in less efficient and less researched markets – such as small-caps and emerging economies – is not correct. Midgen, head of index funds strategy at the firm, cites S&P figures that suggest a majority of active managers have tended to underperform in these areas over the past 15 years. For instance, in emerging markets 80% of funds underperformed, while in the same time period 84% of US small-cap active funds underperformed their indexes. Active underperformance also occurred in 58% funds studied in the European small-caps sector. Overall, passive index returns beat active fund returns 87% of the time, and the average active fund underperforms its index by 2.6% annually. Midgen said passive returns were bound to beat active due to simple mathematics. “All stocks have to be owned by someone, and passive investors earn the market return, less low costs. Active investors also earn the market return less high costs – so in aggregate, passive investors will always earn higher net returns than active investors,” he said. “It’s clear active management can be as ineffective in allegedly inefficient markets as it can be in efficient ones.” Active managers generally argue that they can add value in markets that are less covered by broker research. ©2016 funds europe

Sponsored Profiles

SPONSORED FEATURE: Investing for income

May 17, 2017

Portfolio Manager Thomas Kruse examines the findings from Pioneer Investments’ survey on income investing and outlines ways of achieving a target income.

SPONSORED ARTICLE: A radical solution to KYC concerns

May 17, 2017

The 1MDB affair shows that lax know-your-customer and due-diligence procedures are a major risk, says Paolo Brignardello, head of product management and marketing, Fundsquare. New solutions are...

SPONSORED FEATURE: AIFMD - What does Brexit mean?

Apr 18, 2017

An open discussion between funds industry experts and initiated by SGG Luxembourg took place in London to examine  the implications of Brexit for UK fund managers marketing to the EU.

SPONSORED FEATURE: Luxembourg fund reporting – CRS vs FATCA

Apr 18, 2017

Luxembourg funds need clear procedures for CRS compliance, writes Andrew Knight, Partner at M Partners, a member of the Maitland network of law firms.

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Finding managers that can (and do)

Apr 18, 2017

Fabrice Kremer, a fund selector at Banque de Luxembourg Investments, has berated fundamental managers for failing to beat indices, but he remains committed to active funds. He speaks to Nick...

JERSEY INTERVIEW: ‘A steady sort of place’

Mar 21, 2017

The chief executive of Jersey Finance is keen to portray the island as a stable, trustworthy jurisdiction. He talks to George Mitton.



May 17, 2017

With such an intangible product, it can be hard for asset managers to communicate what they do. Having personality and connecting with customer aspirations may be the key, our branding roundtable hears.

ROUNDTABLE: The issue is perception

Mar 21, 2017

Our panel discuss tax transparency, the elegance of private placement and why Jersey could do more to promote itself. Chaired by Tom Cowsill in Saint Helier.