Investor group angered at Priips rejection

A consumer body has criticised members of the European Parliament for, it says, only considering the views of the financial services industry in its proposal for rejecting draft rules for the Priips regulations. Better Finance, which describes itself as a European federation of investors and financial services users, said its members back the Parliament’s proposed rejection of “misleading” and “overly complex” draft implementation rules under Priips, or Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products regulations – but for different reasons to politicians. The European Supervisory Authorities drafted the proposed ‘regulatory technical standards’ for Priips – approved by the European Commission but facing rejection by MEPs – which would amend rules around how assetmanagers calculate and display fund charges and investment performance. Better Finance says the officially stated rationale for rejection of the technical standards omits mention of the elimination of past performance disclosures, including that of product benchmarks, which Better Finance feels is the most “crucial and critical issue” for EU citizens as savers. Omitting past performance from key information documents will prevent EU savers from knowing whether a product has made or lost money in the past, and whether it ever met its investment objective or promise, says the group. It will also prevent savers from comparing similar products, such as index and index-benchmarked funds, or choosing between different with-profit life insurance policies. Better Finance also believes the proposed rules are inconsistent with the EU initiative for a Capital Markets Union, which calls for greater transparency on the past performance of long-term savings products. MEPs will vote on the issue tomorrow. ©2016 funds europe

Sponsored Profiles

SPONSORED FEATURE: Investing for income

May 17, 2017

Portfolio Manager Thomas Kruse examines the findings from Pioneer Investments’ survey on income investing and outlines ways of achieving a target income.

SPONSORED ARTICLE: A radical solution to KYC concerns

May 17, 2017

The 1MDB affair shows that lax know-your-customer and due-diligence procedures are a major risk, says Paolo Brignardello, head of product management and marketing, Fundsquare. New solutions are...

SPONSORED FEATURE: AIFMD - What does Brexit mean?

Apr 18, 2017

An open discussion between funds industry experts and initiated by SGG Luxembourg took place in London to examine  the implications of Brexit for UK fund managers marketing to the EU.

SPONSORED FEATURE: Luxembourg fund reporting – CRS vs FATCA

Apr 18, 2017

Luxembourg funds need clear procedures for CRS compliance, writes Andrew Knight, Partner at M Partners, a member of the Maitland network of law firms.

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Finding managers that can (and do)

Apr 18, 2017

Fabrice Kremer, a fund selector at Banque de Luxembourg Investments, has berated fundamental managers for failing to beat indices, but he remains committed to active funds. He speaks to Nick...

JERSEY INTERVIEW: ‘A steady sort of place’

Mar 21, 2017

The chief executive of Jersey Finance is keen to portray the island as a stable, trustworthy jurisdiction. He talks to George Mitton.

Roundtables

MARKETING & BRANDING ROUNDTABLE: It’s about aspiration

May 17, 2017

With such an intangible product, it can be hard for asset managers to communicate what they do. Having personality and connecting with customer aspirations may be the key, our branding roundtable hears.

ROUNDTABLE: The issue is perception

Mar 21, 2017

Our panel discuss tax transparency, the elegance of private placement and why Jersey could do more to promote itself. Chaired by Tom Cowsill in Saint Helier.