March 2017

LEGAL EASE: A trigger for liquidity management tools in real estate funds

Brown_and_HouetLiquidity management has been a key part of regulatory reform since the financial crisis in 2008. It has also been the subject of papers from the Financial Stability Board, the European Fund and Asset Management Association, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (Iosco) and, in the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), concerned about wider systemic and stability risks should financial institutions fail. The FCA recently brought liquidity management back into focus for the funds industry with its Illiquid Assets and Open-ended Investment Funds discussion paper. The trigger for this was the suspension of a number of UK authorised real estate funds following the Brexit referendum result. An impending Brexit brings sharply into focus some competing demands for the UK funds industry. On the one hand, the FCA must continue to consider its market integrity and consumer protection objectives. On the other, the UK must remain a competitive and attractive jurisdiction for fund managers post-Brexit. The tone of the paper is encouraging – it is clear the FCA does not intend to prohibit open-ended funds from investing in real estate (or other illiquid assets). Instead, the FCA is seeking to positively engage with the industry to determine how current regulation can be enhanced to support fund managers in meeting their obligations and in ensuring good investor outcomes. The FCA review liquidity management tools such as anti-dilution measures, redemption frequency and notice periods. They also propose a non-exhaustive list of possible improvements, including: 1) Treating professional and retail holders differently by separating them by share class. This is the case in practice in any event, but now we might have different notice periods or dealing frequencies. This would have the consequence that retail investors, who would retain daily dealing, would have an advantage over institutions in being able to redeem more quickly. 2) Having a liquidity buffer by setting a cap on the proportion of illiquid assets held in a fund or by increasing diversification requirements. This could work perhaps as formal guidance to avoid unintentional breaches as property prices move.  3) Requiring managers to follow similar rules to those being introduced in the US in respect of liquidity ‘buckets’ where fund portfolios are subject to limits on the proportion of assets that can be realised for cash within a specific timeframe. In responding, managers could consider how this measure could be framed to be operationally practical for real estate funds. 4) Direct intervention by the regulator, requiring managers to suspend in certain circumstances. This wasn’t required after the referendum and arguably it should not be necessary in a well-functioning market. Both Iosco and the FCA have acknowledged that the liquidity management tools already available for investment funds are not widely used – perhaps being viewed negatively in the market or not considered operationally practical for property funds (e.g. deferred redemptions on a daily dealt fund).  As such, fund managers should take this opportunity to engage with the FCA, to suggest improvements to existing measures and practical feedback on the new proposals. The aim should be to achieve a stronger framework of liquidity management tools which will support real estate funds, increase investor confidence and understanding, and allow the sector to continue to grow in a post-Brexit UK. The deadline for responses is May 8. Julian Brown, partner and Laura Houët, principal associate, Eversheds Sutherland ©2017 funds europe

Sponsored Profiles

SPONSORED FEATURE: Investing for income

May 17, 2017

Portfolio Manager Thomas Kruse examines the findings from Pioneer Investments’ survey on income investing and outlines ways of achieving a target income.

SPONSORED ARTICLE: A radical solution to KYC concerns

May 17, 2017

The 1MDB affair shows that lax know-your-customer and due-diligence procedures are a major risk, says Paolo Brignardello, head of product management and marketing, Fundsquare. New solutions are...

SPONSORED FEATURE: AIFMD - What does Brexit mean?

Apr 18, 2017

An open discussion between funds industry experts and initiated by SGG Luxembourg took place in London to examine  the implications of Brexit for UK fund managers marketing to the EU.

SPONSORED FEATURE: Luxembourg fund reporting – CRS vs FATCA

Apr 18, 2017

Luxembourg funds need clear procedures for CRS compliance, writes Andrew Knight, Partner at M Partners, a member of the Maitland network of law firms.

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Finding managers that can (and do)

Apr 18, 2017

Fabrice Kremer, a fund selector at Banque de Luxembourg Investments, has berated fundamental managers for failing to beat indices, but he remains committed to active funds. He speaks to Nick...

JERSEY INTERVIEW: ‘A steady sort of place’

Mar 21, 2017

The chief executive of Jersey Finance is keen to portray the island as a stable, trustworthy jurisdiction. He talks to George Mitton.



May 17, 2017

With such an intangible product, it can be hard for asset managers to communicate what they do. Having personality and connecting with customer aspirations may be the key, our branding roundtable hears.

ROUNDTABLE: The issue is perception

Mar 21, 2017

Our panel discuss tax transparency, the elegance of private placement and why Jersey could do more to promote itself. Chaired by Tom Cowsill in Saint Helier.