March 2017

SPONSORED FEATURE: Alternative thinking

Portfolio Manager Davide Cataldo discusses the results of the Pioneer Investments’ survey on liquid alternatives and how investors can be encouraged to increase their allocation. Diminishing returns from traditional asset classes have encouraged investors to look further afield in their allocations, including liquid alternatives. However, there is still some hesitation among investors to fully embrace this area. Funds Europe surveyed 70 readers to find out why*. What is beyond dispute is that investors are mostly concerned about returns and drawdowns. As understandable as this is, in our view the greatest concern should be the permanent impairment of capital, says Davide Cataldo, Head of Absolute Return Multi-Strategy. “It is possible to ride out volatility and drawdown if you have the stomach for it and a long enough time horizon. But investors can get nervous and pull out prematurely.” The survey shows that the majority of investors have allocated no more than 10% of their portfolio in liquid alternatives. While this might be a slight increase on previous years’ allocations, there are still few willing to invest 20% or more. According to Pioneer Investments’ internal research, an allocation closer to 20% can help improve the risk/return profile of a traditional asset mix.** “Perhaps investors need to set their minds to a bigger allocation, one that we believe could produce better risk-adjusted returns.” It is a challenging conundrum for the advocates of liquid alternatives – to persuade the cautious that they may get better returns from a bigger allocation. Two-thirds of the survey’s respondents cited mandate guidelines and a lack of clarity over how to deploy the strategies as their major constraints for allocating more to liquid alternatives. This, says Cataldo, is in part due to the heterogeneous nature of the liquid alternative tag. Liquid alternatives cover a huge breadth and this makes it difficult for investors to decide from which traditional asset class they should increase their allocation to this diverse asset class. Ultimately these choices depend on individual investors’ circumstances and, in this regard, increased diversification and reduced correlation with equities and bonds should be seen as benefits. There are also issues over mandate guidelines. In the traditional investment world, mandates are relatively straightforward. Most equity mandates involve beating a benchmark, but in an unconstrained liquid alternatives world, there are no benchmarks. It will take time for some investors to recognise the benefits of this change, says Cataldo. “Having an unconstrained approach is a new way of thinking – using cash as the benchmark. It is not about relative performance – there is no point beating the benchmark but having a negative return. It is not about relative performance but absolute returns.” In order to persuade cautious investors to make the leap of faith in to higher allocations of liquid alternative strategies, fund managers will have to challenge their investors’ thinking and promote the benefits of the asset class. But the educative efforts will also have to be supported by delivering consistent returns over time, says Cataldo. “It will come down to who generates alpha and who doesn’t. It is harder to generate alpha without a benchmark, but it separates the good from the bad.” Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated all information and views expressed are those of Pioneer Investments as at 16 February 2017. These views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions and there can be no assurances that countries, markets or sectors will perform as expected. The content of this document is approved by Pioneer Global Investments Limited. In the UK, it is approved for distribution by Pioneer Global Investments Limited (London Branch), Portland House, 8th Floor, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5BH. Pioneer Global Investments Limited is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority.  Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) are available from us on request. Pioneer Investments is a trading name of the Pioneer Global Asset Management S.p.A. group of companies. ©2017 funds europe

Sponsored Profiles

SPONSORED FEATURE: Investing for income

May 17, 2017

Portfolio Manager Thomas Kruse examines the findings from Pioneer Investments’ survey on income investing and outlines ways of achieving a target income.

SPONSORED ARTICLE: A radical solution to KYC concerns

May 17, 2017

The 1MDB affair shows that lax know-your-customer and due-diligence procedures are a major risk, says Paolo Brignardello, head of product management and marketing, Fundsquare. New solutions are...

SPONSORED FEATURE: AIFMD - What does Brexit mean?

Apr 18, 2017

An open discussion between funds industry experts and initiated by SGG Luxembourg took place in London to examine  the implications of Brexit for UK fund managers marketing to the EU.

SPONSORED FEATURE: Luxembourg fund reporting – CRS vs FATCA

Apr 18, 2017

Luxembourg funds need clear procedures for CRS compliance, writes Andrew Knight, Partner at M Partners, a member of the Maitland network of law firms.

Executive Interviews

INTERVIEW: Finding managers that can (and do)

Apr 18, 2017

Fabrice Kremer, a fund selector at Banque de Luxembourg Investments, has berated fundamental managers for failing to beat indices, but he remains committed to active funds. He speaks to Nick...

JERSEY INTERVIEW: ‘A steady sort of place’

Mar 21, 2017

The chief executive of Jersey Finance is keen to portray the island as a stable, trustworthy jurisdiction. He talks to George Mitton.



May 17, 2017

With such an intangible product, it can be hard for asset managers to communicate what they do. Having personality and connecting with customer aspirations may be the key, our branding roundtable hears.

ROUNDTABLE: The issue is perception

Mar 21, 2017

Our panel discuss tax transparency, the elegance of private placement and why Jersey could do more to promote itself. Chaired by Tom Cowsill in Saint Helier.